Ondrej Holzman Umhlaba wonke njengamanje ubukele izigcawu ezimbi ezivela eParis, lapho ezinsukwini ezimbili ezedlule abahlaseli abahlomile bagqekeze endlini yezindaba Umagazini i-Charlie Hebdo futhi wadubula ngokungenaluzwela abantu abayishumi nambili, kuhlanganise namaphoyisa amabili. Umkhankaso othi "Je suis Charlie" (NginguCharlie) wethulwa ngokushesha emhlabeni wonke ngokubambisana nephephabhuku lamasonto onke elihlekisayo, elivame ukushicilela opopayi abayimpikiswano.
Ekusekeleni umagazini ngokwawo kanye nenkululeko yokukhuluma ehlaselwa amaphekula ahlomile, angakabanjwa, izinkulungwane zabantu baseFrance zangena emigwaqweni futhi zagcwala i-intanethi ngezimpawu ezithi "Je suis Charlie" opopayi abaningi, ezithunyelwa ngamaciko avela emhlabeni wonke ukuzokweseka ozakwabo abangasekho.
Ngaphezu kwezintatheli nabanye, u-Apple naye wajoyina lo mkhankaso, okuyinto ekuguqulweni kwesiFulentshi kuwebhusayithi yakho uvele wafaka umyalezo othi "Je suis Charlie". Ngakolunye uhlangothi, kuyisenzo sokuzenzisa esikhundleni sesenzo sobumbano.
Uma uya esitolo se-e-book sakwa-Apple, ngeke uyithole i-Charlie Hebdo yamasonto onke ebhuqayo, okungenzeka ingomunye womagazini abadume kakhulu eYurophu okwamanje. Uma wehluleka ku-iBookstore, ngeke uphumelele naku-App Store, lapho okunye okushicilelwe kunezinhlelo zakho zokusebenza ezikhethekile. Nokho, akungenxa yokuthi leli sonto lamasonto onke alifuni ukuba khona. Isizathu silula: ku-Apple, okuqukethwe kweCharlie Hebdo akwamukeleki.
Imvamisa opopayi abaphikisanayo bavela esembozweni (hhayi lapho kuphela) kumagazini omelene nenkolo futhi ogxile kwesokunxele, futhi abadali babo babengenankinga yokungena kwezombusazwe, isiko, kodwa nasezihlokweni zezenkolo, kuhlanganise ne-Islam, eyagcina ibulale abantu. bona.
Kwakuyimidwebo eyimpikiswano eyayingqubuzana nemithetho eqinile yakwa-Apple, okufanele ilandelwe yiwo wonke umuntu ofuna ukuyishicilela ku-iBookstore. Ngamafuphi, i-Apple ayizange ilokothe ukuvumela okuqukethwe okungase kube yinkinga, nganoma yiluphi uhlobo, ezitolo zayo, yingakho ngisho nomagazini iCharlie Hebdo ungakaze uvele kuwo.
Ngo-2010, lapho i-iPad ingena emakethe, abashicileli bephephandaba lesiFulentshi lamasonto onke babehlele ukuqala ukuzakhela uhlelo lwabo lokusebenza, kodwa ngesikhathi betshelwa ukuthi uCharlie Hebdo wayengeke akwazi ukungena e-App Store ngenxa yokuqukethwe kwayo. , badela imizamo yabo ngaphambili. "Lapho beza kithi bezokwenza uCharlie we-iPad, salalela ngokucophelela," wabhala ngo-September 2010, owayengumhleli oyinhloko wale magazini UStéphane Charbonnier, oteketiswa ngelikaCharb, okwathi naphezu kokuvikelwa ngamaphoyisa, akazange asinde ekuhlaselweni kwamaphekula kwangoLwesithathu.
“Lapho sifika esiphethweni ekupheleni kwengxoxo ukuthi singashicilela okuqukethwe okuphelele ku-iPad futhi sikuthengise ngentengo efanayo nenguqulo yephepha, kubonakale sengathi sizokwenza isivumelwano. Kodwa umbuzo wokugcina washintsha yonke into. Ingabe i-Apple ingakhuluma nokuqukethwe amaphephandaba ewashicilelayo? Yebo kunjalo! Akukho ubulili futhi mhlawumbe ezinye izinto, "kuchaza uCharb, echaza ukuthi kungani uCharlie Hebdo engazange ahlanganyele kulo mkhuba ngesikhathi lapho, ngemva kokufika kwe-iPad, izincwadi eziningi zokuphrinta zazihamba ngedijithali. "Eminye imidwebo ingase ibhekwe njengokuvuvukala futhi ingase ingaphumeleli ekuhlolweni," dodali umhleli oyinhloko we I-Bacchic.
Encwadini yakhe, u-Charbonnier wavalelisa i-iPad unomphela, ethi i-Apple ayisoze yahlola okuqukethwe kwakhe okuhlekisayo, futhi ngasikhathi sinye wethembele kakhulu ku-Apple kanye nesikhulu sayo ngaleso sikhathi uSteve Jobs ukuthi angakwazi ukukhokhela into enjalo ngaphansi kwenkululeko yokukhuluma. . “Isithunzi sokufunda ngedijithali asilutho uma siqhathaniswa nenkululeko yabezindaba. Siphuphuthekiswe ubuhle benqubekelaphambili yezobuchwepheshe, asiboni ukuthi unjiniyela omkhulu empeleni uyiphoyisa elincane elingcolile," u-Charb akazange athathe ama-napkins akhe futhi wabuza imibuzo engacacile mayelana nokuthi amanye amaphephandaba angakwamukela kanjani lokhu kuhlolwa okungenzeka kwe-Apple, noma ngabe. akudingekile ukuba bazidlulele ngokwabo, kanye nabafundi be-iPad bangaqinisekisa ukuthi okuqukethwe kwayo, ngokwesibonelo, akuzange kuhlelwe uma kuqhathaniswa nenguqulo ephrintiwe?
Ngo-2009, umdwebi wekhathuni waseMelika owaziwayo uMark Fiore akazange adlulise inqubo yokugunyazwa ngesicelo sakhe, uCharb aphinde akhulume ngaso esikhundleni sakhe. U-Apple ulethe imidwebo ka-Fiore ehlekisayo yosopolitiki njengehlekisa abantu basesidlangalaleni, okwakuphula imithetho yayo ngokuqondile, futhi yenqaba uhlelo lokusebenza ngalokho okuqukethwe. Konke kwashintsha ezinyangeni ezimbalwa kamuva, lapho uFiore ewina uMklomelo wePulitzer ngomsebenzi wakhe njengomdwebi wekhathuni wokuqala ukushicilela ku-inthanethi kuphela.
Lapho uFiore ekhononda ngokuthi angathanda nokungena kuma-iPads, lapho ebona khona ikusasa, u-Apple waphuthuma kuye ngesicelo sokuthi aphinde athumele isicelo sakhe sokugunyazwa. Ekugcineni, i-app ye-NewsToons yafika e-App Store, kodwa, njengoba avuma kamuva, u-Fiore wazizwa enecala kancane.
“Impela, uhlelo lwami lokusebenza luvunyiwe, kodwa kuthiwani ngabanye abangazange bawine i-Pulitzer futhi mhlawumbe babe nohlelo lwezepolitiki olungcono kakhulu kunami? Uyakudinga ukunakwa kwabezindaba ukuze uthole uhlelo lokusebenza olunokuqukethwe kwezepolitiki okugunyaziwe?” U-Fiore ubuze ngokunganaki, icala lakhe manje elisikhumbuza ngokumangalisayo imikhuba yamanje engapheli ye-Apple yokunqaba bese iphinda ivumela izinhlelo zokusebenza ku-App Store ezihlobene nemithetho ye-iOS 8.
U-Fiore ngokwakhe akakaze azame ukuthumela uhlelo lwakhe lokusebenza ku-Apple ngemva kokwenqatshwa kokuqala, futhi ukube wayengenakho ukwaziswa ayekudinga ngemva kokuwina uMklomelo wePulitzer, cishe wayengeke aze afike e-App Store. Indlela efanayo yathathwa umagazini wamasonto onke uCharlie Hebdo, okwathi, lapho ezwa ukuthi okuqukethwe kwawo kuzoba ngaphansi kokuhlolwa kwe-iPad, wenqaba ukuhlanganyela ekushintsheni kwifomu ledijithali.
Kuyamangaza ukuthi i-Apple, ebixwaya kakhulu okuqukethwe okungalungile kwezepolitiki funa konakalise ingubo yayo emhlophe qhwa, manje isimemezela ukuthi "NginguCharlie."
Buyekeza ngomhla ka-10/1/2014, 11.55:2010 AM: Sengeze esihlokweni isitatimende esivela kulowo owayengumhleli oyinhloko we-Charlie Hebdo u-Stéphane Charbonnier kusukela ngo-XNUMX mayelana nenguqulo yedijithali yakhe yamasonto onke.
Akulungile ngempela lokho.
Ngaphandle uma kukhona isixhumanisi sezinguqulo ze-elekthronikhi zeminyaka embalwa edlule yemagazini ngaphansi kwalowo mugqa omnyama.
Lokhu kuhlukumeza inqubo yokugunyazwa kuyanyanyisa ngempela futhi kuyingozi enkululekweni. Okulandelayo, i-Apple izofuna ukugunyaza amakhasi angalayishwa esipheqululini. I-Apple ngokuqinisekile ayinayo ingubo emhlophe yeqhwa, kanye nezinkampani ezifanayo. Ukube wayenesizotha kwabahlukunyezwayo, wayevala umlomo.
Yebo, kuyanyanyisa futhi kuyingozi enkululekweni njengokuvakashela indawo yokudlela yabantu abadla imifino futhi ukhononde ngokuthi abayithengisi inyama lapho.
Kulungile, ngikhohliwe ukuthi indawo yokudlela ye-Vegetarian = abayiphakeli inyama iyafana ne-Apple = ngibheka ukuthi iyiphi iphephandaba ongayifunda. Ngiyaqonda ukuthi ingase ifanele abanye abantu.
Kodwa abalawuli lutho, yibhizinisi labo abalibekela imibandela ethile, futhi noma ubani owephulayo ngeke bamvumele angene, lokho kunengqondo. Yehlisa umoya, thenga iphephandaba ku-inthanethi noma uye eParis uyolithenga, ngicela ungabhali umbhedo mayelana ne-Apple elawula ukuthi imaphi amaphephandaba ongawafunda. Unezinketho ezingu-X ezengeziwe zokufika ephephandabeni. Futhi uma i-appstore/ibooks ingakuphathi kahle, sekuyisikhathi sokuthi ushintshe inkundla.
Futhi kuthiwani uma, ngokwesibonelo, iGoogle isusa konke okushiwo yi-Apple? Ucabanga ukuthi lokho kungaba kuhle futhi? Yinkampani ezimele phela...
Yebo, kungaba kuhle, njengoba ubhalile, yinkampani ezimele futhi ingasho imithetho eyifunayo. Kodwa lokho akusho ukuthi imithetho ilungile. Futhi ukuthi ziqinisile noma cha kunzima kakhulu ukuzisho ngobuqotho, ngoba wonke umuntu uyoba nombono ohlukile ngakho.
Ingabe iphephandaba alinayo iwebhusayithi, ngakho idinga uhlelo lokusebenza ku-Appstore? Futhi angiqondi ngempela ukuthi yini abantu abayithola icasula nge-Apple ezwakalisa ukudabuka kwabo ngale ndlela, futhi angicabangi ukuthi kuwukuzenzisa. Ukukhetha kwamahhala akukhona nje ngokushintsha amadivaysi, lapho kukhona ithuba lokulanda isicelo esinjalo kumncintiswaneni, uma kukhona noma yiluphi uhlelo lokusebenza olunjalo lwenziwe lapho. Kodwa mayelana nokuthola ezinye izindlela zokufinyelela kokuqukethwe okunikeziwe nangamadivayisi we-Apple. Ngifinyelele okuqukethwe kwabo ku-inthanethi namuhla nge-iPhone yami. Angizange ngiyibhekisise kabanzi, kodwa iyasebenza, ngakho-ke yini inkinga. Anginazo izinhlelo zokusebenza eziyibhiliyoni efonini yami okufanele ngilande izinhlelo zokusebenza zobuntatheli. Futhi ziningi zazo esitolo. Angikudingi ngempela lokho. Enye inketho ukubhalisa kokuphakelayo kwabo ku-Twitter noma ku-Facebook futhi ngokuqinisekile nakwamanye amanethiwekhi omphakathi. Ngakho-ke angiboni ukuthi ubani odlalayo lapha. Futhi angiqondi ukuthi ubani ongakwazi ukuqonda ukuthi i-Apple, njengomnikazi wenkampani, ibeka imithetho yokugunyazwa kohlelo lokusebenza noma lokho okungavela noma okungeke kuvele ngaphakathi kwe-Apple. Angiyithathi imithetho enjalo njengokuhlola, kodwa iqiniso. Idlulisele enkampanini/enkampanini lapho usebenza khona. Kukhona futhi ezinye iziqondiso nokuthi kuthiwani ngomphakathi, ukungezwani okuthile futhi ngokuqinisekile akubhekwa njengokuvinjelwa kwenkululeko. Futhi ngangingaqhubeka.
Yebo, lokho kungaba kuhle ngokuphelele. Umbuzo uthi ngabe ukhona yini osazosebenzisa i-Google uma engafiki kokuthile okucace njenge-Apple enjinini yokusesha ejwayelekile. Kulokhu, kumayelana nekhwalithi yomkhiqizo. Futhi uma i-Apple ibinganyamalala ku-Google, amakhasimende akwa-Google cishe angancipha kakhulu kunalokho amakhasimende akwa-Apple azo (anciphile) ngokungafuni ukushicilela iphephabhuku lekhathuni eliyisiphukuphuku, okuthe kuze kube kuleli sonto, sonke esixoxa lapha besingazi. Vuma ku-Macropus ukuthi i-Charlie Hebdo yebiwe ngokuphelele kuwe ngoLwesibili futhi awuzange ulwele ukufakwa ku-App Store. Noma yebo?
Yebo, angiyifundi uCharlie, kodwa kuyisimiso engiye ngasigxeka lapha izikhathi ezimbalwa. Inkinga ukuthi ungakwazi ukukhohlisa abantu kalula ngale ndlela futhi bangase bangaboni. Futhi okubaluleke kakhulu, kwenziwa kancane, ukuze umsebenzisi ajwayele. Futhi-ke nge-Apple, umuntu unokukhetha ukuya kwenye indawo futhi unethonya engxenyeni encane yabasebenzisi be-PC. Uma iMicrosoft noma i-Google, ephethe imakethe, yenza into efanayo, kungaba ihlazo, ngoba ithonya lalezi zinkampani emphakathini liningi.
Mayelana nokuqukethwe, iMicrosoft inethonya elincane kakhulu kune-Apple. Ngakho-ke kulapho ithiyori yakho intengantenga khona. Futhi nakhu, ngemuva kwakho konke, ukuthi umuntu ongazange ahlangabezane nemibandela ye-Apple wayengavunyelwe ukungena ku-AppStore. Kubi? Kungani? Ingabe iqiniso lokuthi i-Apple ayikuvumeli izithombe zobulili ezingcolile esitolo sayo futhi kuwumkhawulo wenkulumo yamahhala nokucwaninga? Mhlawumbe yebo, mhlawumbe akunjalo, kodwa ibhizinisi lakhe nepolitiki yakhe kanye nenkululeko yakhe. Uma ungakuthandi, hamba kwenye indawo. Phela, i-Apple akuyona ukuphela kwendlela lapho umuntu engafunda khona lo mbhedo. Ngakho-ke awukwazi ukukudlulisa njengokusongela okuthile okumnyama noma imingcele yenkululeko...
Yebo, i-Google ayishicileli izixhumanisi ezephula imithetho yayo.
amen
Ukunakwa, uma i-Apple icela, i-Google izosusa imiphumela yokusesha ye-password ye-Apple eYurophu, kodwa akukhulunywa ngayo kakhulu, kungenxa yokuthi omunye waseSpain, lapho engena ku-Google, wathola ukuthi wayekweleta, okuyinto. sekunesikhathi eside cha...
kuyingozi enkululekweni? :D ngoba engafuni ukushicilela idayari yama-caricatures agcona osopolitiki/inkolo? ukuthi nje i-apula linemithetho ethile eligunyaza ngayo, futhi uma othile engahlangabezani nale mithetho, khona-ke ishwa....kungani, ngokushesha nje lapho bengavumeli intatheli ukuthi ishicilele okuthile endaweni ethile, njll., wonke umuntu uqala ukuma futhi abukise ngenkululeko yokukhuluma?
Njengochwepheshe be-IT, ngithanda ukukutshela into eyodwa. I-Apple iyazi i-100% ukuthi lokho engakulawuli, ayikwazi ukushintsha, futhi cishe ayikho engozini yokulawula i-intanethi, ngakho-ke ngiyangabaza ukuthi izohlola i-intanethi ezinhlelweni zayo noma kumadivayisi ayo. Ukufeza lokhu, ngokuphumelelayo ngempela, kuzodingeka asebenzise isamba esikhulu sezinsiza futhi, ngaphezu kwakho konke, isikhathi, futhi umphumela ngeke uhambisane nomzamo.
Ngaphezu kwalokho, kuyamcacela futhi ukuthi uma esekwenzile lokhu, inani lamadivayisi aboshwe ejele lizokhula, ngoba i-iOves ayiyona into eyisiphukuphuku njengoba kukhulunywa ngayo, futhi ukuhamba kwalaba basebenzisi be-AppStore baya eCydia akuyona inhloso yakhe. ...
Okuwukuphela kwento akwaziyo ukuzibamba yizinto azidalile, okungukuthi i-AppStore, i-IBookStore, i-iTunes Store, futhi lapho uzokwenza noma yini ayifunayo, ngisho noma ngezinye izikhathi evumela umbono womphakathi.
Ingabe nawe unguCharlie?
http://frantisekmatejka.blog.idnes.cz/c/442897/Jsi-taky-Charlie-Ja-teda-rozhodne-ne-Ja-nejsem-Charlie.html
Umbhedo omubi lowo. Ubuzenzisi buyini ngomuntu ozwakalisa ubumbano nezisulu zokubulawa ngesihluku okwenziwa izinhlanya ezishisekayo. Lokhu akusho ukuthi i-Apple kufanele ivumelane nezindatshana eziphelelwe umqondo kanye nezithombe zopopayi zomagazini "we-satirical", oyisiphukuphuku nje futhi ozama ukudicilela phansi noma ngubani nganoma yiziphi izindleko. Vumela noma ubani ofuna ukuyifunda, futhi vele kuyimbudane futhi kubi ngempela ukuyibulala, kodwa lokho namanje akusho ukuthi lo magazini akuwona nje udoti, futhi akumangazi nakancane ukuthi u-Apple akazange avume. ku-App Store. Lokhu kuhlola kunobuzenzisi kunalokho. Futhi angazi nokuthi kuyini uma inkampani ezimele ingavumeli umuntu oyingozi enkululekweni ebhizinisini layo. I-Apple ngokuqinisekile ayinayo ingubo emhlophe qhwa, kodwa nakanjani ku-Apple ukunquma ukuthi yini abayivumelayo esitolo sabo nokuthi yini abangayisebenzisi. Futhi uma singawuthandi umgomo wakhe, sinenkululeko yokuzikhethela. Okungukuthi, yeka ukusebenzisa imikhiqizo yakhe. Buyelani phansi madoda. I-Apple yinkampani ezimele, ayizenzi imidiya ezimele, futhi ayiyona eyomphakathi. Ngakho-ke ungakhulumi ngenkululeko lapha uma ungakwazi ukuhlonipha inkululeko yakwa-Apple.
Ngivumelana ngokuphelele, i-athikili yama-tabloids echemile. ukugxeka u-apula ngokuzwakalisa ukuzwelana nezisulu, njengawo wonke umhlaba, kuphume ngokuphelele emgqeni.
Cishe awuqondanga ukuthi isiqubulo esithi Je suis Charlie = I am Charlie asisho nje ukudlulisa amazwi enduduzo, kodwa futhi nokubhalisela izindinganiso ezimelwe le magazini. I-Apple ikwenze kwacaca esidlangalaleni ukuthi ayihambisani nalezi zindinganiso, ngakho-ke kunamahloni futhi akufanelekile ukusho okuncane. U-Apple ubengakwenza njenge-Google futhi avele abeke iribhoni elimnyama njengendlela yokududuza.
Angivumi, kuleso simo kufanele futhi ugxeke i-New York Times - benqabile ukushicilela opopayi abafanayo ngoba bephule imithetho yabo yangaphakathi futhi nokho bano "nous sommes charlie" kuwebhusayithi.
Yebo, bangabazenzisi abafanayo!
Iqiniso lokuthi i-Apple yenqaba ukudayisa iphephabhuku iCharlie Hebdo akusho ukuthi yabenqaba nokuthi iyenqaba inkululeko yokukhuluma. Ngingasho nje ukuthi bacabange ngokunengqondo lapho futhi benqaba ukushicilela okuqukethwe esitolo sabo okungacasula ezinye izinkolo noma izizwe. Okungukuthi, ngombono, ngokwezehlakalo zezinsuku ezimbalwa ezedlule, kungaholela ekuhlaselweni kwamaphekula ezitolo ze-Apple eYurophu.
Umbhedo lowo. Ngaleso siqubulo, iningi labantu lithi nathi singabantu, abeLungu, mhlawumbe amaFulentshi, obaba, izintatheli, noma ngubani, futhi asifuni ukubulawa ngenxa yombono noma ihlaya, ubuwula noma i-caricature, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi iziwula kangakanani. Ikona. Kodwa abantu abaningi ngokuqinisekile ababhaliseli izindinganiso zikaCharlie Hebdo, okuwumbhalo nje oyisiphukuphuku, empeleni ongenawo amanani. Kodwa lokho akusho ukuthi umuntu kufanele abadubule ngenxa yalokho. Futhi yilokho "Je suis Charlie" imayelana.
Bengifuna ukuyibhala, usuyinikile
I-Apple nje..
Ukuphela kwento engangiyiqonda kulesi sihloko ukuthi uCharlie Hedbo akazange athumele "isicelo" ku-App Store? Ngakho-ke i-Apple ayikwazanga ngisho nokubenqaba ngokoqobo. I-athikili ithi kuphela umshicileli uzame ukudala uhlelo lokusebenza lwe-iPad, kodwa ngenqubo othile wabatshela ukuthi babengenalo ithuba lokulenza ngenqubo yokugunyaza. Ngakho imayelana nani indatshana? I-hypothesis, kuthiwani uma bekunjalo? Ngakho-ke njengoba bengazange "bafake isicelo" ku-App Store, u-Apple akakaze abenqabe ngempela, futhi manje sebegxekwa ngokubonisa uzwela? Hhayi-ke, yini engingengeza...
Singeze esihlokweni isitatimende sokuqala sikaCharb oyinhloko ka-2010, lapho achaza khona ukuthi lapho etshelwa ukuthi okuqukethwe kwakhe kuzocutshungulwa lapho kufinyelela ku-iPad, akakwazanga ukukwamukela.
kahle!! ulihumushe ngobulima!!
Ikuphi inkinga?
Ngakho i-Apple ayikubekezeleli isb. Uma umhleli oyinhloko engakwazi ukukwamukela, akulona iphutha le-Apple. Ngicabanga ukuthi bebengadingekile - u-Apple ubebafuna lapho, bebengazimisele nje ukuyeka ilungelo labo lokuqukethwe kwe-veto ababecabanga ukuthi akufanelekile. Angiboni lutho olungalungile ngalokho.
Ngaphandle kwalokho, ngiyaqonda ukuthi abantu bathanda ukumangalela u-Apple ngobuzenzisi. Kodwa ukungavumelani no-100% wokuqukethwe kodwa ukuhlonipha inkumbulo yabo akubona ubuzenzisi ngombono wami, ububele obuyisisekelo nje.
Ngakho-ke ngiyalithola iphuzu, kodwa ngicabanga ukuthi amagama anjengokuzenzisa nokucwaninga ngokungavumeli izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-iBookstore zihlangane njenge-overkill. Bekungaba indatshana ethokozisayo ngaphandle kwabo, lokhu kungeze ngokungadingekile ukuthinta kwama-tabloids.
Kodwa akuyona nje i-Apple. Wonke amaphephandaba namaphephandaba aku-inthanethi ahlanganisa i-TV yase-US ihlola opopayi abavela kulo magazini. Ngakho-ke yonke imidiya e-US ikuyo.
Ukucwaninga ukungenelela kombuso noma iziphathimandla ezifanayo kokuqukethwe. Uma amaphephandaba angasese (abezindaba bebonke) benquma ukuthi yini okufanele bayishicilele ephephandabeni labo nokuthi yini engekho, akukhona ukucwaninga. Kuyisinqumo sabo esisemthethweni. Njengawe, uyanquma ukuthi ubani omvumela angene engadini yakho. Uma ungavumeli umuntu angene lapho, akusona imingcele yenkululeko yokuhamba, kodwa isinqumo sakho esifanele ofuna ukuba naye engadini yakho.
Kunjani ukuba uCharlie?
http://www.dfens-cz.com/view.php?cisloclanku=2015011001
Angiliqondi iphuzu lalesi sihloko. Ekuqaleni, ubhala: "Umkhankaso othi 'Je suis Charlie' (NginguCharlie) wethulwa ngokushesha emhlabeni wonke ngokubambisana nephephabhuku lamasonto onke elihlekisayo, elivame ukushicilela opopayi abayimpikiswano."
Ngakho-ke i-Apple ayikwazi ukukhombisa ubumbano ngokwenqaba umagazini okukhulunywa ngawo esitolo sayo? Noma ingabe ngimane ngingawaqondi amazwi aleso sihloko?
Angilubuyekezi uhlelo lwabo lokusebenza, ibhuku, njll. inqubomgomo yokulinganisa. lokhu okwenkulumompikiswano ende futhi kunemifantu eyanele, okungukuthi. isibonelo Fiore, khona-ke kukhona inala PCalc nezinye App Store...
Ngokubona kwami, usibambe ngeshwa isihloko. Isinqumo sika-Apple sokungavumeli umuntu ku-Appstore asihlanganise lutho nenkulumo yamahhala. Kuyisinqumo sezentengiselwano futhi ukugqugquzela kwaso kuyindaba yamaqembu amabili ebhizinisi. Noma ucabanga ukuthi umthengisi wezincwadi ongathengi esitolo futhi ngenxa yalokho unikeza amakhasimende akhe incwadi (nganoma yisiphi isizathu) ngaleyo ndlela usongela inkululeko yokukhuluma? Cishe awucabangi kanjalo. Ku-Apple, ivele ihlanganiswe ngamandla ayo ebhizinisi. Akukho okunye, akukho okuncane. Futhi ukuxhumanisa umbono wakho, yithi, amazwi enduduzo ayathambekela kancane futhi awanabucunuli ngokwedlulele.
Yebo, ngokombono wokuveza ubumbano, ukusuka ku-Apple kubonakala kuyisidingo (ngokwethonya nobukhulu benkampani). Kodwa umbhali waqala isihloko esithakazelisa kakhulu. Ngiyaqonda ukuthi i-Apple ayifuni i-porn, izinhlelo zokusebenza ezingenangqondo, njll. ezitolo zayo... Kodwa lokhu kungolunye udaba. Uma i-apula lenqaba ukushicilela amamagazini noma amaphephandaba ngenxa nje yokuthi, nakuba lingeyona into ehlanzekile kakhulu ngesitayela, kodwa kusewuhlobo lwaseYurophu lokugxeka, akunandaba ukuthi liyini, libonakala lingafaneleki kumthwalo we-apula wepolitiki nezenhlalo. Okufanayo nangezinhlelo zokusebenza ezingekho ngaphansi kolawulo lwazo ngokuqondile. Uma kukhona engingakuthandi nge-Apple futhi engicabanga ukuthi kunganciphisa "umphumela opholile" kakhulu, yilokhu. Ngaleyo ndlela i-Apple iyaziphikisa ngokuphelele futhi yehlisa ukusebenza kwemishini yayo kanye nokunikezwa kwezincwadi nomagazini. Okubi nakakhulu, i-apula iqala kancane ukuphendukela abaculi futhi ibenze bangakwazi ukusebenza endaweni esabalele kakhulu, ngaleyo ndlela benciphisa amathuba abo okusabalalisa umsebenzi wabo. Kuyisono. Mhlawumbe u-Tim uzokhulula izintambo kancane kubaculi, abathuthukisi noma izintatheli futhi abavumele ukuthi basebenzise iseyili eyakhiwa uSteve Jobs ngobuhlakani futhi lapho abakhethiwe kuphela ababevunyelwe ukubhala khona.
Ezwakalisa ukungavumeli ukuxazulula inkinga ngokudubula abantu ehhovisi labahleli futhi singashicileli okuqukethwe okuyimpikiswano, lezi yizinto ezimbili ezihlukene! Ngabe usho lokhu okubhala lapha ngempela? Ungacabangi ukuthi i-Apple ibifuna ukusho ukuthi noma singavumelani nalokho okubhalayo, bekungadingeki ukuthi bakudubule ngaso leso sikhathi. Ngabe nginephutha?
U-Apple wanikeza njengezaba, ngoba uCharlie wayengelinye ifulethi, ngakho wengeza, ukuthi wayengafuni lutho oluzomhlanganisa noCharlie isikhathi eside akuzange kumvimbe ekwenzeni lokho. I-Google, ngendlela engingayithandi ngayo, iziphathe kangcono kakhulu, izwakalisa ukudabuka kwayo ngeribhoni elimnyama. I-Apple iphinda idlala kuphela uhlelo oluyihlazo futhi iyeka ukuba wuphawu lothando. Lona omunye umugqa wokuxaka.
futhi uma engakwenzanga, wayezoba ngumuntu omubi ngoba akazange ajoyine