U-Michal Ždanský Evikini eledlule kutholakele iphaneli yangaphambili yengilazi ebukeka iyiqiniso ye-iPhone 6 ezayo ethengwe nguSony Dickson. Esikhathini esedlule, lokhu sekukwazile ukuthola ezinye izingxenye ze-iPhones nama-iPads, okuthi, ngokwesibonelo, kwembule ukuba khona kwe-iPhone 5c yepulasitiki noma i-5s yegolide. Unikeze iphaneli ku-YouTuber owaziwayo uMarques Brownlee, owahlola iphaneli ngokumelene nokuphathwa kabi, kuhlanganise nokugwazwa. Ngakho-ke wafika embonweni wokuthi mhlawumbe isibonisi sesafire, okwathi, ngokusho kwevidiyo, kwafunwa nochwepheshe baseBrithani ngale ndaba.
[youtube id=b7ANcWQEUI8 wide=”620″ height="360″]
Ngaphandle kwalokhu, saqhubeka nokungabaza ngeqiniso lokuthi akucaci ngokuphelele kuvidiyo ukuthi ingabe iyisafire ngempela. UBrownlee ubenokungabaza futhi wenza ithimba elivivinya okwesibili, kulokhu nge-sandpaper. I-sandpaper ingahlola ngempela ubulukhuni bento ethile. Ngesikali se-Mohs sobulukhuni, isafire (i-corundum) ingeyesibili ngobukhulu ngemva kwedayimane, okusho ukuthi idayimane kuphela elikwazi ukuklwebha isafire. I-Gorilla Glass, ngakolunye uhlangothi, ithola amaphuzu acishe abe ngu-6,8 kwangu-10. I-sandpaper uBrownlee ayisebenzisayo yayilingana no-7 esikalini, futhi ngokushesha kwacaca ukuthi kwakungeyona ngempela isafire njengoba yayishiya imihuzuko kuphaneli.
Uma kuqhathaniswa nama-iPhone 5s, nawo avivinywa ukuqina, imihuzuko yayingabonakali kakhulu. Ngokuphambene nalokho, ingilazi yesafire evala i-ID yokuthinta yahlala injalo. Ngakho-ke umphumela uba ukuthi iphaneli ye-iPhone 6 esolwayo ayizweli kakhulu kunephaneli ye-iPhone 5s, kodwa akuyona ingilazi yesafire. UBrownlee uphakamisa ukuthi kusengaba yi-hybrid material eyenziwe ngesafire yokwenziwa egcinwe yi-Apple. ilungelo lobunikazi ngonyaka odlule, kodwa maningi amathuba okuthi lesi isizukulwane sesithathu se-Gorilla Glass.
Ngakho-ke i-Apple izokwenzani ngokukhiqizwa kwayo kwesafire futhi oku-odwe ngaphambilini ngaphezu kwengxenye yezigidigidi zamaRandi ukwenza? Ngaphandle kokwenza izibuko zekhava ye-ID ye-Touch ID nesembozo zelensi yekhamera, lapho i-Apple isivele isebenzisa isafire, umnikelo ongcono kakhulu owe-iWatch noma idivayisi efanayo egqokwa esihlakaleni.
Lokhu kukholakala ukwedlula i-Apple ebeka isafire lapho.
Uyazi ukuthi yini ezoba ngcono kakhulu? Ima kancane ngaphezu kwenyanga futhi ubone :)
Lezi zingxenye eziputshuziwe, izithombe, zonke izinhlobo zokucatshangelwa kanye nokuqagela kuphela kuholela ekudumazekeni nasekukhulumeni njengokuthi i-Apple ayizange yethule noma yini okungekho muntu owayazi kusengaphambili futhi lapha lokhu nalokhu ... vele uvumele ukumangala! ;)
Umbhali (ngendlela, hhayi okokuqala) ufuna okuthile ngendlela engavumeli noma iyiphi enye incazelo. Akuqondanga yini kuwe ukuthi ingilazi ingase ingabi yi-IP6 (noma noma yini ezolebulwa ngokuthi)? Angazi ukuthi kuzoba njani, kodwa ngenxa kaNkulunkulu, uhlala usithathaphi leso siqiniseko. Uma ucabanga ukuthi u-Dickson wayeqinisile ngaphambi kwalokho zama ukukhumbula (noma ubheke phezulu) ukuthi ubani owafaka amavidiyo nezithombe zokuqala ze-IP4 emhlabeni. Iqiniso lokuthi into ethile yaba yimpumelelo akusho ukuthi akukubi manje. Angisho ukuthi unephutha, kodwa….
Njengalokhu, ukube besingacabangi ukuthi yingxenye eyiqiniso, besingeke siyishicilele le ndatshana. Njengoba kunikezwe ukuthi ihlolwa nguBrownlee (othembekile futhi okholelwa ukuthi iyiqiniso) futhi inikezwe ukuqina okuqinisekisiwe lapho ingxenye yengilazi ejwayelekile ingasha, ngikholwa ukuthi leli iphaneli ye-iPhone yesikhathi esizayo.
Hhayi-ke, uyabona, lapha ucabanga futhi ucabange, kodwa i-athikili izwakala sengathi yisivumelwano esenziwe. Angisho ukuthi ngeke kube njalo, ngikuthola kucasula indlela ukuqagela ngemibono, noma ngabe ingobani, kuvezwa njengamaqiniso. Futhi uma (ngokumangazayo) kungasebenzi, kuzophuma esinye isihloko, lapho kuzoshiwo ukuthi ngisho nababhali besihloko esandulele abazange bakhathaze (nakuba ekuqaleni bakusho njengeqiniso) nokuthi babeqinisile. . Kodwa lokho kuyisici esijwayelekile sababhali, kuyamangaza futhi kuyaheha, bazonikeza "amaqiniso" esikhundleni sokuthi "amahemuhemu".
Impela bekungafanele kuzwakale kanjalo, kusesemnyangweni "mhlawumbe". Asizimisele neze ukwethula amahemuhemu njengeqiniso ngenxa yokubukwa kwamakhasi. Ngihlele isigaba esandulela elandulelayo ukuze sicacise. Kunoma ikuphi, isihloko sikwenza kucace ukuthi leli kuseyiphaneli "okusolwa ukuthi liputshuliwe".
Ngayo yonke inhlonipho efanele, i-corundum, isafire kanye nokufakwa kwe-abrasive ku-sandpaper yinto efanayo - i-Al2O3, futhi ihlale inobunzima obufanayo, ngaphandle kokuguqulwa. Futhi ngokwesilinganiso sobulukhuni be-Mohs, kusobala ukuthi ukuklwebheka kungenziwa ngezinto ngokwazo noma ngento eqinile. Njengalapho i-abrasive yedayimane ipholisha idayimane libe izindandatho.
Kepha i-sapphire touchID ayizange ikukwele lokho, ngakho-ke i-dispay kumele ibe thambile kunesafire.
Futhi bekungeke yini kube ukuthi icwiliswe kakhulu emzimbeni futhi i-sandpaper eqinile ayizange idlule lapho?
Mina mathupha ngilindele isibonisi se-emerald esine-id yokuthinta yerubi konke kumzimba we-tungsten ngentengo engaphansi kuka-20K. Sawubona