UMartin Lévay Konke obufuna ukukwazi nge-Mac Pro futhi ubungazi ukuthi kungani ukubuza. Sizobheka ukuthi amadrayivu namaphrosesa asebenza kanjani kwamanye amakhompyutha anamuhla anamandla. Thola ukuthi kungani abanye abantu becabanga ukuthi ukukhokha ikhulu le-Mac Pro kuyinani elihle.
Kungani ikhompuyutha yokuhlela ividiyo eyizinkulungwane eziyikhulu ingabizi?
Ukuhlela ividiyo
Ngo-2012, ngathola umsebenzi wokuhlela amavidiyo. Amaphrojekthi wamahora ayishumi ukuhlela, ukwengeza imiphumela nemibhalo. Ku-Final Cut Pro, kamuva ebizwa ngokuthi yi-FCP. "Nginama-Mac amathathu, ngingakwenza ngengemuva lesobunxele," ngizicabangela. Iphutha. Wonke ama-Macs amathathu aqhume ngokugcwele amasonto amabili futhi ngagcwalisa cishe i-3 TB yokushayela.
I-FCP kanye nomsebenzi wediski
Okokuqala, ngizochaza ukuthi i-Final Cut Pro isebenza kanjani. Sizodala iphrojekthi lapho sizolayisha khona u-50 GB wevidiyo. Sifuna ukukhulisa ukukhanya, njengoba ukubala lo mphumela ngesikhathi sangempela kunzima, lokho i-FCP ezokwenza ukusebenzisa umphumela kuyo yonke ividiyo engemuva futhi ikhiphe "ungqimba" olusha olunayo, wow, omunye u-50 GB. Uma ufuna ukwengeza imibala efudumele kuvidiyo yonke, i-FCP izodala isendlalelo esingeziwe esingu-50GB. Basanda kuqala futhi sinokuncane okungu-150 GB kudiski. Ngakho-ke sizofaka amalogo, imibhalo engezansi, sizofaka ingoma. Ngokuphazima kweso iphrojekthi ikhukhumala ibe enye i-50 GB. Kungazelelwe, ifolda yephrojekthi ine-200 GB, okudingeka siyenze isipele kudrayivu yesibili. Asifuni ukulahlekelwa yimisebenzi yethu.
Ikopisha u-200 GB kudiski engu-2,5″
Idrayivu engu-500 GB 2,5" exhunywe nge-USB 2.0 ku-MacBook endala ingakopisha ngesivinini esingaba ngu-35 MB/s. Idrayivu efanayo exhunywe nge-FireWire 800 ingakopisha cishe u-70 MB/s. Ngakho-ke sizokwenza isipele iphrojekthi engu-200 GB amahora amabili nge-USB kanye nehora kuphela nge-FireWire. Uma sixhuma idiski efanayo engu-500 GB futhi nge-USB 3.0, sizokwenza isipele ngesivinini esingaba ngu-75 MB/s. Uma sixhuma idrayivu efanayo engu-2,5″ 500 GB nge-Thunderbolt, ukwenza ikhophi yasenqolobaneni kuzophinde kwenzeke ngesivinini esingaba ngu-75 MB/s. Lokhu kungenxa yokuthi isivinini esiphezulu se-interface ye-SATA sihlanganiswe ne-2,5″ mechanical disk simane sibe ngu-75 MB/s. Lawa amanani engangivame ukuwazuza emsebenzini. Amadiski e-rpm aphezulu angashesha.
Ikopisha u-200 GB kudiski engu-3,5″
Ake sibheke idrayivu engu-3,5″ enosayizi ofanayo. I-USB 2.0 iphatha u-35 MB/s, i-FireWire 800 iphatha u-70 MB/s. Idrayivu engama-intshi amathathu nesigamu iyashesha, sizosekela cishe u-3.0-150 MB/s nge-USB 180 nangeThunderbolt. I-180 MB/s isivinini esiphezulu sediski ngokwayo kulezi zimo. Lokhu kungenxa yesivinini esiphezulu se-angular yamadrayivu amakhulu angu-3,5″.
Ama-disc amaningi, okuningi ekwaziyo
Amadrayivu amane angu-3,5″ angafakwa ku-Mac Pro. Bazokopisha phakathi komunye nomunye cishe ku-180 MB/s, ngilinganise. Ishesha ngokuphindwe kahlanu kune-USB 2.0. Ishesha ngokuphindwe kathathu kune-FireWire 800. Futhi ishesha ngokuphindwe kabili kunokusebenzisa amadrayivu amabili aphathekayo angu-2,5″. Kungani ngikhuluma ngalokhu? Ngoba i-180 MB/s iyisivinini esiphezulu esivame ukufinyeleleka semali evamile. Ukwenyuka okulandelayo kwejubane kungenzeka kuphela ngokutshalwa kwezimali ngokulandelana kwamashumi ezinkulungwane zamadiski e-SSD, asabiza kakhulu ngobukhulu obuphezulu, sizothini.
Ngokushesha!
Kunezindlela ezimbili zokudlula umkhawulo ongu-200 MB/s lapho ukopisha amabhulokhi amakhulu edatha. Kufanele sisebenzise i-USB 3.0 noma i-Thunderbolt ukuze sixhume kanye namadiski angajwayelekile axhunywe ku-RAID noma amadiski amasha abizwa nge-SSD axhunywe nge-SATA III. Umlingo wokuxhuma amadiski ku-RAID wukuthi ijubane lamadiski amabili njengeyunithi ye-RAID licishe liphindwe kabili, ngokwezibalo (180+180) x0,8=288. I-coefficient engu-0,8 engiyisebenzisile incike kwikhwalithi yesilawuli se-RAID, kumadivayisi ashibhile iseduze no-0,5 futhi ngezixazululo zekhwalithi ephezulu iseduze no-1, ngakho-ke amadrayivu amabili angu-3,5″ angu-500 GB axhunywe ku-RAID azofinyelela okwangempela. isivinini esingaphezu kuka-300 MB/ nge. Kungani ngikhuluma ngalokhu? Ngoba, ngokwesibonelo, i-LaCie 8 TB 2big Thunderbolt Series RAID izosekela u-200 GB wethu wevidiyo isikhathi esingaphansi kwemizuzu eyi-12 uma sisebenza ku-SSD ku-Mac futhi sigcine nge-Thunderbolt, lapho isivinini sokukopisha singaphezu kuka-300 MB/ s. Kuhle ukukhumbula ukuthi intengo yediski idlula izinkulungwane ezingamashumi amabili, futhi isivinini nokunethezeka okuzuziwe cishe ngeke kusetshenziswe umsebenzisi ojwayelekile. Ubukhulu obufinyeleleka ngokweqiniso buzungeze u-800 MB/s uma sixhuma amadrayivu amabili e-SSD ku-RAID, kodwa amanani asevele engaphezulu kwemiqhele engama-20 yesitoreji esingu-512 GB. Noma ubani oziphilisa ngempela ngevidiyo noma ngokucutshungulwa kwezithombe uzokhokha umphefumulo kadeveli ngesivinini esinjalo.
Umehluko kuma-disc
Yebo, umehluko phakathi kwedrayivu ku-USB 2.0 nedrayivu exhunywe nge-Thunderbolt amahora amabili uma kuqhathaniswa nemizuzu eyishumi nambili. Lapho ucubungula ayishumi alawo maphrojekthi, uvele ubone ukuthi iThunderbolt ekhompyutheni enediski ye-SSD (i-retina display ku-quad-core MacBook Pro) iyinani elihle impela, ngoba wonga okungenani amahora amabili esikhathi kuphrojekthi ngayinye. okwenzelwe izipele kuphela! Amaphrojekthi ayishumi asho amahora angamashumi amabili. Amaphrojekthi ayikhulu asho amahora angama-200, lokho kungaphezu kwenyanga yesikhathi sokusebenza ngonyaka!
Futhi uyini umehluko ku-CPU?
Angizikhumbuli izinombolo eziqondile ngenhla kwekhanda lami, kodwa bengidweba ukuthi amakhompyutha ami azokhipha iphrojekthi efanayo ngokushesha kangakanani ku-FCP. Bekungenzeka ngempela ukusho ukuthi sine-Core 2 Duo, noma i-dual-core i5 noma i-quad-core i7 noma i-8-core Xeon. Ngizobhala indatshana ehlukile ekusebenzeni kweprosesa kamuva. Manje kafushane nje.
Imvamisa noma inani lama-cores?
Isoftware ibaluleke kakhulu. Uma i-SW ingalungiselelwe inani elikhulu lama-cores, khona-ke umgogodla owodwa kuphela ogijimayo futhi ukusebenza kuhambisana newashi lokucubungula, okungukuthi imvamisa yengqikithi. Sizokwenza izibalo zokusebenza zibe lula ngokuchaza ukuthi wonke amaphrosesa aziphatha kanjani kumafrikhwensi angu-2 GHz. Iphrosesa ye-Core 2 Duo (C2D) inama-cores amabili futhi iziphatha njenge-dual-core processor. Ngizoveza lokhu ngokwezibalo njengo-2 GHz izikhathi ezingu-2, ngakho-ke 2×2=4. Lawa kwakungamaphrosesa ku-MacBook ngo-2008. Manje sizoxoxa nge-dual-core i5 processor. Uchungechunge lwe-i5 ne-i7 lunokubizwa ngokuthi i-hypertherading, ezimweni ezithile engakwazi ukusebenza njengama-cores amabili angeziwe cishe ngo-60% wokusebenza kwama-cores amabili amakhulu. Ngenxa yalokhu, i-dual-core ohlelweni iyabika futhi kancane iziphatha njenge-quad-core. Ngokwezibalo, ingavezwa njenge-2 GHz izikhathi ezingu-2 futhi sengeza u-60% wenombolo efanayo, i.e. (2×2)+((2×2)x0,6)=4+2,4=6,4. Yebo, nge-Mail ne-Safari ngeke ube nandaba, kodwa nge-FCP noma izinhlelo zokusebenza ze-Adobe, uzothokozela umzuzwana ngamunye ongamoshi ukulinda "ukwenziwa". Futhi sineprosesa ye-quad-core i5 noma i-i7 lapha. Njengoba ngishilo, iphrosesa ye-quad-core izovela njenge-octa-core enamandla wezibalo angu-2GHz izikhathi ezi-4 + amandla ancishisiwe e-hyperthreading, ngakho (2×4)+((2×4)x0,6)=8+4,8 =12,8, XNUMX.
Izinhlelo ezimbalwa kuphela, ikakhulukazi ezichwepheshile, ezizosebenzisa le midlalo.
Kungani iMac Pro?
Uma i-Mac Pro ephakeme inama-cores ayishumi nambili, lapho-ke nge-hyperthreading sizobona cishe angu-24. Ama-Xeons agijima ku-3GHz, ngokwezibalo, izikhathi ezingu-3GHz izikhathi ezingu-12 + hyperthreading, 3×12+((3×12)x0,6)= 36 +21,6=57,6. Uyaqonda manje? Umehluko phakathi kuka-4 no-57. Izikhathi eziyishumi nane amandla. Ukunaka, ngikuthathe kude kakhulu, ezinye izinhlelo (i-Handbrake.fr) zingasebenzisa kalula i-80-90% ye-hyperthreading, bese sifika ku-65 yezibalo! Ngakho-ke uma ngithekelisa ihora ngisuka ku-FCP ku-MacBook Pro endala (ene-2GHz dual-core C2D), kuthatha cishe amahora ayi-15. Nge-dual-core i5 cishe emahoreni angu-9. Cishe amahora angu-5 nge-quad-core i4,7. I-Mac Pro yokugcina "ephelelwe yisikhathi" ingakwenza ngehora.
Imiqhele eyizinkulungwane eziyikhulu ayiningi kangako
Uma othile ekhononda ngokuthi i-Apple ayizange ibuyekeze i-Mac Pro isikhathi eside, baqinisile, kodwa iqiniso liwukuthi ama-MacBook Pros amasha ane-Retina avela ku-2012 acishe abe yingxenye yokusebenza kwamamodeli ayisishagalombili ayisisekelo e-Mac Pro asuka ku- 2010. Okuwukuphela kwento engasolwa ku-Apple ukuntuleka kobuchwepheshe ku-Mac Pro, lapho ingekho i-USB 3.0 noma iThunderbolt. Lokhu cishe kuzobangelwa ukungabikho kwe-chipset yamabhodi omama ane-Xeons. Ukuqagela kwami ukuthi i-Apple ne-Intel basebenza kanzima ukwenza i-chipset ye-Mac Pro entsha ukuze izilawuli ze-USB 3.0 ne-Thunderbolt zisebenze ne-Intel's server (Xeon) processors.
Iphrosesa entsha?
Manje ngizoba nokuqagela okuncane. Naphezu kokusebenza okunonya ngempela, ama-Xeon processors abelokhu emakethe isikhathi eside futhi singalindela ukuphela kokukhiqiza kanye nemodeli entsha yalawa maphrosesa "eseva" maduze nje. Ngenxa ye-Thunderbolt ne-USB 3.0, ngicabanga ukuthi kuzovela i-motherboard entsha ene-multi-processor ene-Intel i7 processors "ejwayelekile", noma ukuthi i-Intel izomemezela amaphrosesa amasha wezixazululo zama-multi-processor ahambisana ne-USB 3.0 ne-Thunderbolt. Kunalokho, ngithambekele eqinisweni lokuthi iphrosesa entsha izokwakhiwa ngobuchwepheshe obusha obunokugcinwa kwejubane okwengeziwe emabhasini. Nokho, kusekhona iprosesa ye-A6, A7 noma i-A8 evela ku-Apple workshop, enikeza ukusebenza okuqinile ngokusetshenziswa kwamandla okuncane. Ngakho-ke uma i-Mac OS X, izinhlelo zokusebenza nezinye izinto ezidingekayo zishintshiwe, ngingacabanga ukuthi besingaba ne-Mac Pro entsha ene-64 noma i-128 core A7 processor (ingaba kalula ama-quad core chips ayi-16 esokhethini elikhethekile) lapho ukuthunyelwa ngaphandle. kusuka ku-FCP kuzogijima ngisho nangaphezulu kunama-Xeon ambalwa anyathelwe phansi. Ngokwezibalo, i-1 GHz iphindaphinda izikhathi eziyi-16 izikhathi ezi-4, ngaphandle kwe-hyperthreading izobukeka ngokwezibalo icishe ifane no-1x(16×4)=64, futhi isibonelo ama-chips angu-32 quad-core A7 (quad-core engiwenzayo, i-Apple A7 chip akukamenyezelwa) futhi sisemazingeni okusebenza ezibalo angu-1x(32×4)=128! Futhi uma uhlobo oluthile lwe-hyperthreading lwengezwe, ukusebenza bekuzokwenyuka ngokugxuma kanye nemingcele. Angicabangi ukuthi kuzoba kulo nyaka, kodwa uma i-Apple ifuna ukugcina igcizelele ku-ecology, ukunciphisa ukusetshenziswa ngokusebenzisa iphrosesa yeselula kubonakala kimi kuyisiqondiso esinengqondo eminyakeni ezayo.
Uma othile ethi i-Mac Pro indala futhi ihamba kancane, noma inenani eliningi kakhulu, kufanele bakhulume ngakho. Yikhompyutha ethule ngendlela emangalisayo, enhle futhi enamandla kakhulu naphezu kokuba isemakethe isikhathi eside. Ngawo wonke ama-akhawunti, amaphilisi athatha kancane kodwa ngokuqinisekile esikhundleni sezincwadi zokubhalela namakhompyutha edeskithophu, kodwa indawo ye-Mac Pro kusitudiyo somculo noma sezithombe ngeke inyakazeke isikhathi eside. Ngakho-ke uma i-Apple ihlela ukuvuselela i-Mac Pro, khona-ke kungalindelwa ukuthi izinguquko zizoba zibanzi futhi maningi amathuba okuthi ngeke zilandele kuphela kodwa futhi zidale izitayela ezintsha. Uma i-Apple ibigxile ekuthuthukisweni kwe-iOS, khona-ke ngemuva kokuphothula izobuyela kumaphrojekthi ewabambe okwesikhashana, okungenani yilokho okubonakala encwadini ethi "Inside Apple" ka-Adam Lashinsky. Uma kucatshangelwa ukuthi i-Final Cut Pro isivele isekelwa abakhiqizi bediski ngesixhumi se-Thunderbolt, ikhompyutha entsha yochwepheshe isendleleni ngempela.
Futhi uma i-Mac Pro entsha iza ngempela, cishe sizogubha inkosi entsha, ezophinde ithathe isihlalo sayo sobukhosi ngokusebenza okungenanhliziyo nokuluhlaza kufihlwe ekhabetheni elithule neliningilizayo, uJonathan Ive azophinde asibonise lona. . Kodwa iqiniso liwukuthi, uma esebenzisa icala lokuqala le-Mac Pro lika-2007, ngeke nginake nakancane, ngoba lipholile ngempela. Ngisho nokwengeza i-Thunderbolt kuzobaluleka ngokwanele kwabanye bethu ukuthi siphume ezihlalweni zethu sithenge i-Mac Pro entsha. Futhi ngiyabaqonda futhi ngizokwenza okufanayo endaweni yabo. Imiqhele eyizinkulungwane eziyikhulu empeleni ayiningi kangako.
Siyabonga ngokufunda kuze kube manje. Ngiyazi ukuthi umbhalo mude, kodwa i-Mac Pro ingumshini omangalisayo futhi ngingathanda ukukhokha intela kubadali bayo ngalo mbhalo. Uma kwenzeka uthola ithuba, libhekisise, susa ikhava bese ubhekisisa ukupholisa, ukuxhumeka kwezingxenye kanye noxhumo lokushayela, ukuthi icala le-PC yakho endala lihluke kanjani ku-Mac Pro. Futhi uma ulizwa ligijima ngamandla agcwele, khona-ke uzoqonda.
Iphile nkosi.
i-athikili enhle, ayikho nalokhu:
Nokho, kusekhona iprosesa ye-A6, A7 noma i-A8 evela ku-Apple workshop, enikeza ukusebenza okuqinile ngokusetshenziswa kwamandla okuncane. Ngakho-ke uma i-Mac OS X, izinhlelo zokusebenza nezinye izinto ezidingekayo zishintshiwe, ngingacabanga ukuthi besingaba ne-Mac Pro entsha ene-64 noma i-128 core A7 processor (ingaba kalula ama-quad core chips ayi-16 esokhethini elikhethekile) lapho ukuthunyelwa ngaphandle. esuka ku-FCP izogijima kakhulu kunama-Xeon ambalwa anyathelwe phansi."
akunakwenzeka ngempela ukubala, amaphrosesa anjalo kuzodingeka afakwe ebhodini ngabayishumi nambili ukuze kube nokusebenza kwe-xeon eyodwa, ingasaphathwa eyesidingo sokuhlanganisa yonke isoftware...
Ngokubona kwami kungenzeka, kodwa angicabangi ukuthi kuzokwenzeka ngesizukulwane esilandelayo, kuqala ngesilandelayo bese kuba ngesinye... Maningi amathuba okuthi yini ezokwenzeka esizukulwaneni esilandelayo. MP. Kungenzeka impela ukuthi amaphrosesa amasha avela ku-AMD azovela kumaLungu amasha ePhalamende, noma azonikeza inketho ku-i7/Xeons ngokusekelwe ezidingweni zamakhasimende. Kodwa-ke, uma bethola amaphrosesa avela ku-AMD kumaLungu amasha ePhalamende, ngicabanga ukuthi i-GPU nayo izophuma ku-AMD... Uma kukhona ama-Xeons, ngicabanga ukuthi singalindela amakhadi ehluzo avela ku-nVidia kuma-Macs...
Ngokungeziwe kumaphrosesa avela ku-Apple (AX), i-Apple inikeza ukusebenza okuphelele futhi amakhompyutha ayo (Macs), uma kunesidingo, ayahambisana neWindows noma enye i-OS... Isinyathelo esinganikeza indawo kubaprosesa bazo "sazongcwaba" ngokuphelele amaphrojekthi anjengala. njenge-BootCamp, izinkampani ezifana ne-Parallels Desktop noma i-VMWare, kanye namaphrojekthi amaningi amahhala asebenza ekusebenzeni izinhlelo zokusebenza zamanye amapulatifomu ku-OS X... Lesi yisizathu sokuthi kungani ngicabanga ukuthi ngeke neze sibabone abacubungula abavela ku-Apple ku-MP okwamanje.
Ngiyabonga.
Yebo, ukubuyisela yonke i-SW, kodwa i-Apple yakwenza kanye ngaphambili, lapho ithuthela ku-Mac OS X. Futhi yakhokha. I-Microsoft ayizange ikwenze futhi manje "ifuna isiteshi" ... Akunakukhishwa, nakuba ngivuma ukuthi kuzwakala kuhlanya, uma ucabanga ukuthi ingakanani isofthiwe entsha edalwe eminyakeni eyisithupha edlule nokuthi kanjani umsebenzi omkhulu kungaba ukukuhlela ngandlela thize ngendlela enengqondo.
ngokuqinisekile, kodwa akwenzekanga, nakanjani kuze kube yilapho ama-ARM processors esebenza kahle kumadivayisi angewona amaselula... kodwa kungase kudingeke silinde lokho ngokuzayo, ngeke wazi.
Isihloko esihle. Ngempela. Ilinganisa kahle ukuthi ukusebenza komthengi kuhluke kanjani kochwepheshe. Ngakho-ke, ngokufanayo, ngizokukhombisa ukuthi akugcini ngeMac Pro yakho. Kunalokho, kuyaqala. Ubuchwepheshe obuchazwe empeleni buvela endaweni yeseva.
Amadiski: iqiniso liwukuthi, ngokuphambene, idiski engu-2.5″ inamandla amakhulu esivinini. Ijubane le-angular liyafana kumadiski azungeza ngesivinini esifanayo, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi makhulu kangakanani (yingakho enama-angular). Kodwa unentshisekelo yokuthi ingakanani idatha endizayo ngaphansi kwekhanda ngesikhathi soguquko olulodwa. Hhayi-ke, njengoba ama-disc angu-2.5 enomthamo ophezulu wokuqopha ngediski ngayinye, angaba ngcono. Kungakho ama-servos angu-2.5″ 15k RPM aphezulu.
Xeon: lokho ngeke kuphele. Iphrosesa yeseva futhi iphila kahle kakhulu lapho. Futhi yilapho izinkinga ze-Mac Pro zivela khona. Pho kungani lingafiki? Awekho ngempela ama-chipset e-Xeon ane-USB 3.0/Thunderbolt, ngoba akekho owadingayo kumaseva. Futhi awukwazi ukufaka esikhundleni i-i7 Xeon, ngoba ayikwazi ukwenza izinto eziningi (awukwazi ukubeka eziningi zazo ebhodini elilodwa). Ngakho-ke iMac Pro entsha izoba ne-Xeons ngaphandle kwe-USB 3 noma nge-i7 eyodwa. Kokubili kungaba yigxathu elibuyela emuva. Ngakho akulutho. Futhi ngiyangabaza kakhulu ukuthi i-Intel izoshesha ukuthuthukisa i-chipset ye-Xeons ngenxa ye-Mac Pro, ngeshwa, yazalwa nguwe.
Siyabonga ngolwazi ngobuchwepheshe beseva. Futhi akubonakali kunengqondo kimi ukuthi iMac Pro entsha ngaphandle kwe-USB 3 noma ene-i7 izoba phakathi kwamaXeons. Kunalokho, kubonakala kimi njengento ethokozisayo (engenakwenzeka) yeprosesa entsha. Phela, i-Apple yake yaphoqa i-Intel ukuthi ikhiqize iprosesa encane ye-MacBook Air.
Ngombono wami othobekile, iMac Pro yakamuva inamandla amaningi, ngisho nabasebenza kahle, ngakho-ke kungenzeka ukuthi i-Apple ishaya phansi ngonyawo lwayo futhi iklabalase "Ngiyayifuna futhi ngiyayifuna futhi ngiyayifuna!" igazi. Futhi kubonakala kimi ukuthi esinye sezizathu ezenza amanani esitoko ehle ukuphoqa i-Apple ukuthi ihlehle "entweni", kodwa angazi ukuthi kungaba yini lokho. Usopolitiki wakudala onjalo ngemuva, ngicabanga ukuthi intengo yamasheya iyindlela yokuphoqelela. Sehlisa izintengo zesitoko, abanikazi bamasheya baqala ukusunduza, futhi i-Apple ekugcineni ithobela. Kodwa lokho kuwukuqagela nje, ubani owaziyo ukuthi kunjani. Noma kunjalo, angisiboni isitoko njengophawu olubi oluvela kwa-Apple, njengophawu olubi oluvela kwenye indawo…
Ngicabanga ukuthi i-i7 multiCPU ingakwenza
Angikwazi. Bheka nje http://ark.intel.com
Kuzodingeka bashintshe ukwakheka kwekhabhinethi kancane, ngenxa ye-EU. Kodwa lesi sihloko sihle futhi yonke into ichazwa ngokungaphelele. Umsebenzi omuhle.
isihloko esihle
Isihloko esihle. Ngibonga kakhulu. Leyo ncazelo yezibalo yokusebenza yangivula amehlo. Ukube bengingumhleli okhokhelwayo noma umculi, bengizoya kuye. Ngidinga i-iMac yezithombe :) Noma iqinile...
I-Mat ty love nayo iya ku-Mac Pro manje, Ngaphandle kwalokho ukufunda okuhle :-)
okwamanje i-MBP 13 yami (ngasekupheleni kuka-2011) kufanele yanele
Iqiniso limayelana ne-100 yekhompiyutha esengizame kakade, ukhokha ukuthenga imishini emisha ngewaranti eyengeziwe.
Noma nginomshini oshibhile cishe we-35, noma nginenzuzo encane yonyaka, cishe i-1500 CZK ngenyanga etshalwe kukhompyutha akuyona inhlekelele enjalo uma iqhathaniswa (ngisho noma enye i-CZK eyi-1000 ngenyanga, okuyi-Adobe ne-Quark. ukungikhipha ngesikhathi somsebenzi wami we-DTP).
Kusekuncane kakhulu uma kuqhathaniswa nokuthi imoto idla malini nyanga zonke ohambweni lwenkampani.
Ngithola umshini ongasasebenzi kakhulu ngokokuziphatha futhi nginawo ngaphansi kwewaranti yaso sonke isikhathi sokusebenza.
Mina ngokwami ngineMacPRO (EARLY 2008) 2x2,8GHz quad-cpre Intel Xeon - inkumbulo 2GB 800MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM Graphics ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB
Ngisanda kuyithengela ukuhlelwa kwevidiyo Isebenze ne-iMovie. Kodwa angikwazi nokulanda i-Final Cut PRO lapha. Kungakho ngayilayisha ku-flash drive nge-MacBook Pro ngase ngiye ku-MacPRO - ngenxa yalokho, igaya njengohlanya, ayikwazi ukuqedela ukubala ngemuva nje ngokufaka uguquko futhi uma kwenzeka okuthile - kunalokho. awe phansi. I-MacPRO inendodana (iminyaka engu-8 ubudala) ekamelweni layo futhi ijabulela i-Minecraft kuyo - angifuni ukuyithengisa ngenxa yentengo yokuthenga, kodwa i-iron nje namuhla ... Iqiniso liwukuthi ' m umsebenzisi ongenalwazi lwezidingo ze-hardware futhi mhlawumbe udinga nje ukulungiswa okuthile - ku-iStyle, lapho ngiphethe khona yonke into, bangithengisele i-iMac entsha, futhi ayinaso isikhathi sokubala noma yini ku-FinalCut Pro, kodwa okungenani okuthile. Ngakho-ke ngicela ningicebise ukuthi yini engingayenza ukukhulisa i-Mac PRO yami ukuze ibe yinhle njengoba uchaza? Ngiyabonga.
Mhlawumbe ungasho ukuthi iyiphi inguqulo ye-Final Cut oyisebenzisayo :) Uma kungenjalo izodinga okungenani u-8 GB we-RAM, ngokufanelekile u-16 GB :)
njengoba i-2GB incane kakhulu ku-x-eksisi iyodwa, ingasaphathwa eyomhleli wevidiyo
Siyabonga ngempendulo. Inguqulo yamanje ku-AppStore, okungukuthi i-Final Cut Pro X 10.0.8
I-RAM ingabe ingakwazi ukuyinyakazisa? Cishe kusenenkinga ngekhadi lezithombe - lingitshele ukuthi alisekelwe...
Kukhona amandla okucubungula anele, uma idiski ingeyokuqala nayo izokwanela. Inkinga ngokusobala ukuntuleka kwe-RAM, ngingangeza ku-8 GB (amamojula we-2 × 4 GB), okuningi cishe akudingekile. Isofthiwe ibaluleke ngendlela efanayo, ngakho-ke bengizofaka kabusha i-Mountain Lion kudiski ehlanzekile bese ngifaka i-FCP yakamuva ngemva kokulanda izibuyekezo. Kufanele yenze cishe okufanayo noma okungcono kunalokhu engikusebenzisile. Bengingeke ngizihluphe ngomlayezo mayelana nekhadi lezithombe, bheka okulandelayo.
Ku-FCP, ngisebenzise i-13″ MacBook Pro (Late 2011, 2,4 GHz dual-core i5 ene-hyperthreading) futhi ngasebenzisa okukhiphayo kusuka ku-Intel HD graphics 3000 (512 MB) kuya ku-iMac engu-27″, engiyishintshele kumodi yokubonisa. Impela, iMacBook isithuthukisiwe yaba ngu-8 GB we-RAM, idrayivu ithathelwe indawo i-Intel SSD 240 (ukubhala okungu-220 MB/s, 400 MB/s kufundwe), kodwa umsebenzi nge-Full HD wawushesha, bengilindile nje. ukuze uthole ikhophi lapho wenza ikhophi yasenqolobaneni futhi idluliselwa kwenye idrayivu , kanye nokuthunyelwa ngaphandle. Eyesibili, endala, engu-17 ″ MacBook Pro ecishe ibe neprosesa efanayo (2,53 dual-core i5) ngaphandle kwe-SSD ayizange iziphathe ngokushesha, ngakho ngigcine ngokuhlela ku-13″ MacBook Pro kanye ne-iMac engu-27″, futhi ngasebenzisa. i-17″ MacBook Pro yokuthunyelwa kwevidiyo, engiyinqume ku-13″ MBP.
Yebo, ngiyazi ukuthi ngimangele ngokuba nama-Mac amathathu, kodwa mhlawumbe ngeke ngikuchaze :-)
Ngiyabonga kakhulu ngempendulo. Nakuba ngididekile kancane mayelana "nokushayela" kusuka ku-iMac kuya ku-MacBook... Kodwa ngicabanga ukuthi ngiyakuqonda ngokuyisisekelo. Ngiphinde ngabheka i-iMac - ngine-4GB ye-RAM lapho, futhi iMacBook Pro nayo ine-4GB ye-RAM - okungenzeka ukuthi akusona isimangaliso, kodwa ngizoyishiya njengoba injalo bese ngithumela "umkhulu" we-MAC Pro ku- insizakalo yokuqinisa... Kuyishwa ukuthi ukuhlela ividiyo ngikwenza njengento yokuzilibazisa, kodwa i-RAM, i-GB, i-HDD, njll. iyidolobhana lami lase-Spanish futhi ANGIFUNI ukuyifunda. Awu, ngiyabonga futhi. Impelasonto enhle.
Udinga imidwebo esekela i-CL, ngoba i-Atina ku-MacPro yakho ayiyisekeli. Futhi-ke i-2GB ye-RAM incane kakhulu :)
Ngiphethe imodeli efanayo ye-MacPRO, ekucushweni okuyisisekelo nge-10GB ye-RAM, engase ngiyinwebe yaba ngu-32GB we-RAM. Ngisebenze nayo isikhathi eside ku-FinalCut Pro 6,7, lapho ngingenankinga khona. Kodwa-ke, nge-Final Cut entsha ye-X, kube nenkinga yokusebenza. Ngisengumnikazi we-Macbook ye-retina ekucushweni okuphezulu kakhulu nge-RAM ekhuphukile iye ku-16GB, futhi i-FinalCut isebenza njenge-slingshot kuyo. Ngokwebhentshimakhi, le retina ineprosesa enamandla kakhulu kune-mac pro endala, futhi ingabonakala kumarenders, kodwa umehluko engiwuzwayo lapho ngihlela ku-FinalCut pro X mkhulu kakhulu. Isibonelo, i-Mac Pro ayikwazi ukuphatha ukuxhuma ikhadi le-Blackmagic ukuze lihlole kuqala ireferensi. Kungenzeka ukuthi inkinga isekhadini lemifanekiso. Muva nje, amamodeli amasha ama-2 anamandla wamakhadi wezithombe akhishelwe i-Mac pro, ngakho-ke ngizobona isisombululo lapha.
Isihloko esihle kakhulu, ngiyabonga!
Isihloko esihle, ungabona ukuthi othile uyakuqonda lokhu. Qhubeka nomsebenzi omuhle!
Isihloko esihle kakhulu! Ngiyabonga, ngayifunda yonke indlela "ngesikhathi esisodwa" ...
I-Mac Pro iwumshini omuhle kakhulu, kodwa ingedlanzana elincane le-SW elenziwe kahle (FCP, Cinema4D, angizazi ezinye izinketho...). Angicabangi ukuthi othile uzoyithenga ku-studio esinemifanekiso ye-Photoshop, Illustrator, Indesign. Ukusebenza kulezi zinhlelo zokusebenza ngeke kube phezulu kune-iMac, MacBook Pro, futhi uma kuncane kakhulu, ngoba lezi zinhlelo zokusebenza azikwazi ukusebenzisa ama-cores amaningi. Umehluko wentengo awuvikeleki kuleli cala, ngaphandle kokuthi uthenge i-MacPro ye-bargain.
Ukwenza ifayela le-PSD elingu-700MB ku-Photoshop akuyona inkinga, ifayela lokushintshanisa lingu-13GB ngemva komsebenzi omncane! Ngakho-ke idrayivu esheshayo iyavikeleka. Futhi masingakhohlwa ukuthi i-Photoshop ingenza i-scripting (i-batch processing), into efana "thatha wonke amafayela kule folda futhi usebenzise lezi zihlungi ezinhlanu kuzo, unciphise futhi ulondoloze umphumela njenge-JPG". Amafayela ayizinkulungwane ezimbili aphindwe ngezenzo eziyishumi ngayinye ngayinye anele uhlanya. Ku-Photoshop "ngilayisha" eyodwa bese ngivele "ngidlale". Uma umdwebi wezithombe okhokhelwa ihora elinde umphumela, uzojabula ukuthi kuzoba emaminithini angu-5 hhayi emahoreni amabili.
Kungenjalo, yebo, ukuhambisa ikhesa yegundane esikrinini akunazo izimfuno ku-processor, kodwa ne-InDesign ingacindezela i-CPU lapho ithekelisa ikhathalogi, ibhuku, noma imagazini. Kodwa uma kwenziwa kabili ngesonto, umfana wethu uzozama futhi alinde ihora.
I-Mac Pro ingeyabasebenzi. Uma kufika isikhathi, isisebenzi esiyigugu. Into yesitolo esithengisa izinto ezithengiswayo yenza umqondo kuphela kumuntu owazi kahle ukuthi izosetshenziselwa ini. Kuyimfucuza ekhaya :-)
Ngokwami, ngisebenzisa i-PS futhi, uma kuqhathaniswa ne-Imac, i-MAC PRO isebenza ngaphandle kokulinda, i-Imac yashisa kakhulu.
Gqoka, kuhle :)
ukube bengingenakho okuhlangenwe nakho kwami nabo, bengingase ngikholwe ngisho nalesi sihloko.
Ngiyazibuza ukuthi yimuphi umhleli ongahlanya ngokwanele ukusebenzisa i-FCP X...
kungenzeka ukubalula ukusekelwa kwenkumbulo ye-ECC ehambisana nama-xeons, okungafanele neze ithathwe kalula ngamakhono amakhulu, ikakhulukazi ezindaweni zokusebenza.
Uma othile ekhokha amalitha ayi-100 noma ngaphezulu kwideskithophu, angakwazi ngempela ukuthenga i-SSD disk array yayo. Ngikhala ngokugasela kwe-SW ku-iMac, futhi ngokwami iminyaka eminingana benginethemba lokuthi iMacPro izosekela ngokusemthethweni i-OCZ RevoDrive (ehamba phambili ekuhlaseleni) nokuthi i-QNAP/Synology ekugcineni izofika nesixhumi seThunderbolt. . Ukube bekukhona uhlobo oluthile lwe-Thunderbolt - 4LAN yokunciphisa ngesitoreji. Ukusebenza kwama-PC anamuhla kubonakala KULUNGILE kimi, kodwa isivinini sokugcinwa kwedatha nezidingo zesikhala zisemuva kakhulu.
I-Thunderbolt iyinkinga ye-Intel, engakayinikezeli ku-chipset yesikhulumi se-Xeon processor.
Lesi isihloko sekhwalithi ephezulu kakhulu.
Sanibonani nonke,
okuningi okulotshwe lapha kuyiqiniso, kodwa….
Ngo-2008, ngangibhekene nesinqumo sokuthenga umshini omusha futhi ngakhetha i-APPLE
MacPRO (EARLY 2008) 2x2,8GHz quad-cpu Intel Xeon - inkumbulo 6GB 800MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM NVIDIA 8800 ihluzo.
Inkolelo yami yokuthi izogcina isebenze (ividiyo ye-HD, umsindo) kwaba yiphutha elikhulu (lisebenza kukho kokubili amasampula evidiyo ye-HD nomsindo). Amadiski amaningi esiteshini angivumele ukuthi ngihlole umsebenzi kukho kokubili i-MAC OS ne-Windows ngokuhambisana futhi ngikhethe izilungiselelo nezinhlelo zokusebenza ezifanele kakhulu.
Isiqophi:
Ngisebenzise kokubili i-FC 10 (OSX) ne-Premier 6 (OSX, WIN) isikhashana Uma uzimisele ngomsebenzi wakho, impendulo icacile:
I-HDD: I-SSD kuphela
Izithombe: NVIDA QUATRO K5000
Ividiyo: I-BLACKMAGIC Intensity Pro
Empeleni, akunandaba ukuthi unomshini omusha noma omdala, ngaphandle kwalezi zingxenye kuzoba "isiphithiphithi esibi" Ukusebenzisa Ngemuva Kwemiphumela kanye nemiphumela eyengeziwe ngaphandle kokunikeza akunakwenzeka.
Ukusebenzisa amafayela evidiyo angacindezelwanga noma ama-codec afanayo kuyadingeka uma ungafuni ukulahlekelwa amehlo akho. Konke lokhu kunomthelela esikhaleni sediski esidingekayo, njengoba kubhalwe kahle esihlokweni.
Ekugcineni ngakhetha ukusebenza ku-EDIUS, inkundla yeWindows, ifomethi yedatha yevidiyo engalahleki. Ngiyincoma kini nonke futhi. Futhi iningi lenkinga licindezelwe kakhulu. Ikhadi le-VGA elimaphakathi lanamuhla lifanele imiphumela ye-GPU yangokwezifiso. Kwanele ukuba ne-1-2 SSD HDD, ikhadi levidiyo lokubuka kuqala (ngeshwa kuphela elivela ku-GV). Angisasebenzisi izinhlelo zokusebenza ze-Adobe. I-iMAC yakamuva (okuhlukile okunamandla kakhulu) nayo iwufanele lo msebenzi.
Audio
Lapha, isimo siyefana kakhulu, nakuba kungakhulunywa kakhulu ngaso. Amasampula ensimbi yomculo anamuhla afinyelela osayizi begigi. Uma udlala i-orchestra ye-symphony enjalo, umshini akwanele ukuwulayisha kusuka ku-HDD. Ngakho-ke kuyadingeka ukusebenzisa amadiski e-SSD lapha futhi. Eyodwa eyamasampuli, enye ngeyedatha yomsindo. Uma uqala ukusebenzisa imiphumela evela ku-Wawes kanye ne-Reverbs ehlukahlukene, njll., kuzodingeka uqaphele kakhulu mayelana nokulayisha ngokweqile amaphrosesa, okubonakala ngokucwecwa (ukuyeka). Lapha, futhi, kuyadingeka ukuxazulula inqubo elandelayo ngokunikeza amathrekhi ngamanye (iqhwa) noma ngokusabalalisa umthwalo emishinini eminingana, futhi lokhu kubambezela kakhulu ukudala.
Ngalesi sihloko, ikakhulukazi bengifuna ukusho ukuthi ukuxazulula yonke into kuphela ngombono wediski kanye nendlela abaxhumeke ngayo akuxazululi lutho. Akusho lutho nhlobo ukuthi umshini uzokwakhiwa ngani nokuthi intengo yokugcina izoba yini. Ukusebenza kwayo kuzohlala kunganele futhi kuzomele ulinde. Ngokusebenza ngevidiyo, umshini wami uyasebenziseka ku-SD, ngoba HD isemaphethelweni, nge-3D HD ayisebenziseki.
Futhi i-HD 2K ne-4K ziyangqongqoza emnyango wethu.
Ukusekelwa kokucubungula okuningi ezinhlelweni ezishiwo kuyamenyezelwa ngempela, kodwa ngokuvamile endaweni ethile futhi ngezinye izikhathi. Futhi ngakho-ke kungase kwenzeke ukuthi kufanele unikeze ngoba umphumela osanda kuwusebenzisa (noma uwushintshile) ungowe-singleCPU kuphela. Futhi uyothenga ikhofi noma ugwayi. Izinhlelo zokusebenza zevidiyo zingasebenzisa i-GPU kweminye imiphumela, evame ukusheshisa umsebenzi, kodwa ikhadi elinamandla ngempela liyadingeka.
Isincomo sami: ama-CPU cores ambalwa ewashini eliphezulu ANGCONO kunezinhlamvu eziningi ngewashi eliphansi.
Sengiphetha, ngithanda ukusho ukuthi umshini olinganiswe ngentengo (amapharamitha) yiwo osengozini lapha. Imiphumela embalwa ngokuvamile ingcono kuneminingi. Kuvidiyo, kuqala ukuhlela, bese kuba umphumela nokuhumusha kokugcina, ngokuzolile ngemuva komunye umsebenzi.
Lokhu akusebenzi kuvidiyo ye-HD kuphela, kodwa futhi kumasampula ku-AUDIO.
Sawubona futhi ngiyabonga ngokungeza. Bengingafuni ukungena kule mininingwane, lezi zinkinga zixazululwa ngabantu abambalwa kuphela e-republic, kodwa ngiyavuma, akwanele kwezinye izinto. Isibonelo, i-Příšerky entsha, s.r.o. Udinga ukukhokha izigidi ezimbalwa zamadola futhi indiza enepulazi le-CPU izondizela engadini yakho izinyanga ezimbalwa. Amakhulu ezinkulungwane zama-cores, akleliswe ukukhulisa amandla ekhompuyutha. Ziyimishini yangokwezifiso engavamile enesofthiwe yangokwezifiso engavamile. Ngokuphindwe kazinkulungwane eziyikhulu inani, uqasha izikhathi eziyizinkulungwane eziyikhulu kunokusebenza. Kusukela cishe eminyakeni eyizinkulungwane eziyishumi nambili yokubala, ingancishiswa ibe yizinyanga ezimbalwa nje. Kunjalo, inikezwa ngokuqhubekayo kusukela ku-3D kuya kufomethi yefilimu, ngemva kwezigcawu ezihlala zihlanganiswa egumbini lokuhlela lakudala eline-Windows noma i-Mac OS X.
Kungenjalo, ngiyavuma, Ngemuva Kwemiphumela 7 ku-2,0 GHZ quad core kuhambe kubi kakhulu kune-3.06 GHz dual core enewashi ephakeme. Ishintshe kuphela nge-AE CS5, lapho, ngokwesibonelo, ukubuka kuqala ngesikhathi sokugqwayiza kwemaski kwakushesha. Akukho okuphambene, kodwa intuthuko yayikhona, mhlawumbe ngenxa yokusekelwa kwekhadi lehluzo. Ingasheshiswa ngokugxuma kanye nemingcele ngekhadi elivela ku-BLACKMAGIC, kodwa bengingayidingi kangako :-) Ngiyixazulule lapho ngithenga iMacBook Pro 17 ″, ngakho-ke angikhumbuli izinombolo eziqondile, kodwa umehluko wawukuhlelo lwamaphesenti angamashumi umehluko phakathi kwezinguqulo ze-SW ezisetshenzisiwe.
Ngivumelana namadiski amabili, kodwa futhi kuyadingeka ukwazi ukuthi ngenzani, ukushuna i-HW yomsebenzi ongenziwa abantu abambalwa, "kochwepheshe" abaningi i-voodoo efanayo neyabasebenzisi. Ukuqagela kwami ukuthi bambalwa kakhulu abantu abazi nge-HW yezithombe nezitudiyo zokuqopha futhi nalabo abangakhetha ukukhetha "i-Mac Pro endala" evivinyiwe futhi ehloliwe kunokuzama ukukhohlisa ikhasimende ukuthi lithenge iMacBook Pro ngeRetina ngoba wonke umuntu uthi "isibhamu". Uma othile efuna "into ethile yokuhlelwa kwevidiyo ngezikhathi ezithile", khona-ke i-MBP ene-Retina iyisinqumo esihle, uma ungahlosile ukutshala amakhulu ezinkulungwane.